Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
