Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
69.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
