Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Certate SW
Seafishing
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.86 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank110 centimeter / 43.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €519.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Certate SW and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), the reel delivers reliable, smooth resistance when targeting strong fighters like snapper or pollock
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
