Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
