Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
79.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.52 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €324.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 145g / 5,12oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.03 out of 10 (145g / 5,12oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X
