Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT

Spinning

87.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.52 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €329.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizePC 2500D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ocea Jigger

Multireels

90.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs

Weight791g / 27.9oz

Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €509.60
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000 HG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX and Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX offers a weight of 170g / 6oz, while Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT and Shimano Ocea Jigger?

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX

With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles