Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6878oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26772 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (195g / 6878oz) and ergonomics (6.35 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6878oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
