Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
64.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7584oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29528 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €64.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
