Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36614 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX
