Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT

Spinning

65.30 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €70.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

77.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.55 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €365.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000SFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105

Conclusion

Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX edges out Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.55 out of 10) and the total score (7.74 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency