Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
