Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a weight of 205g / 7,23oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
