Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
