Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 235g / 8,29oz and a durability of 8.61 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
