Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a durability of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
