Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
