Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
