Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin INKS 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
