Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD, 2508QD, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10516-258
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €230.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2508QD
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano Vanford FA, C3000SDHA, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, VFC3000SDHA
Shimano Vanford FA
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €195.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000SDHA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX edges out Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8.36 out of 10) and the durability (5.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch and a ergonomics of 6.38 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano Vanford FA?

There are not much differences between the two comparables