Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
