Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) and the weight (300g / 10,58oz). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
