Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
