Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD

Feeder And Match

84.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.94 out of 10

Gear ratio4.8:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight300g / 10.58oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €229.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3012QD-DH
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

74.70 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX offers a total score of 8.44 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano Sedona FJ?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX

The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.