Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX and Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX offers a gear ratio of 4.8:1, while Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
