Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin INKS 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin INKS 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR QD and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
