Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
55.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.83 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank109 centimeter / 42.91 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €117.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/320

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa BG 4500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Daiwa BG 4500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG 4500X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
