Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 6500X and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 6500X offers a durability of 8.5 out of 10, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X stands out for a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa BG 6500X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
