Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa BG
Spinning
68.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight850g / 29.98oz
Line retireve per crank135 centimeter / 53.15 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €129.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/500

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Both Daiwa BG 8000X and Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa BG 8000X offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Penn International VISW?
Daiwa BG 8000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
