Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Crossfire LT

Spinning

49.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.71 out of 10

Ergonomics6.13 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag-

Weight260g / 9.17oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €32.50
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional

Multireels

55.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.51 out of 10

Ergonomics5.93 out of 10

Gear ratio6:1:1

Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs

Weight520g / 18.34oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €154.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size25N
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Conclusion

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.