Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX and Daiwa TANACOM 800X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 800X stands out for a durability of 5.71 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Fuego LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
