Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
