Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.3:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Ninja LT and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
