Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €274.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 30 II and Daiwa 20 Airity LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
