Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
Feeder And Match
52.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight530g / 18.7oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €78.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Nzon Distance 25, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa Nzon Distance 25
- A line retrieve score of 8.7 out of 10 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
