Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750

Spinning

43.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.54 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €22.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeQC 750
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT

Spinning

63.90 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €79.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (5) and line retrieve per crank (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency