Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
