Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
