Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
