Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 3000S R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 3000S R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X
