Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 3000S R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 3000S R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX
