Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 3000S R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 3000S R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X
