Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Sahara 3000S R
Spinning
38.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics4.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight280g / 9.87oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X and Shimano Sahara 3000S R score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X offers a slight edge in ergonomics, while Shimano Sahara 3000S R may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sahara 3000S R?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Shimano Sahara 3000S R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
