Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
