Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
