Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
