Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
