Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.05/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
