Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.23 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX
