Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
