Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin HORNET 20X
