Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Shimano Tekota
Multireels
66.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio6.3:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight450g / 15.87oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €177.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size600 HGA LCM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 12/440
Conclusion
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Shimano Tekota?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX
- A score of 6.43 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X
