Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 750 clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (20kg / 44,09lbs). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Tanacom 750 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
