Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Conclusion
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (3+1) and line retrieve per crank (82 cm / 32.3 inch). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag?
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 cm / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
