Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa RX LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa RX LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
