Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
46.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch). While Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Regal LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX
